Pretend play and self-regulation: why a child behaves better as a soldier than as themselves
Vygotsky argued that a child shows their greatest self-control inside a role. What self-regulation is, how pretend play exercises it, and how far the evidence goes.
Self-regulation is the ability to hold a goal in mind and override an immediate impulse in its service. Pretend play exercises it because a role carries rules, and a child will hold to a rule they have adopted far longer than to one imposed on them. The mechanism is plausible and observed; the size of the effect is contested.
Well established
That self-regulation in the early years is associated with later academic and wellbeing outcomes.
Contested
Whether structured pretend play programmes produce durable gains in self-regulation. Replication has been mixed.
Not known
How much of the association between early self-regulation and later outcomes is causal rather than shared background.
- Self-regulation covers inhibition, working memory and cognitive flexibility, not simply behaving.
- A role supplies a rule the child owns, which is why standing still is easier as a guard than as oneself.
- Vygotsky made this argument in the 1930s and it remains the standard theoretical account.
- Self-regulation measured in the early years is associated with later attainment and wellbeing.
- Whether play training durably improves self-regulation is genuinely contested.
What self-regulation actually means
In everyday use, self-regulation means behaving. In the research literature it means something more specific and less moral: the set of processes that let a person hold a goal in mind and act on it rather than on whatever is most immediately compelling. It is usually broken into three components.
- Inhibitory control. Stopping a dominant response. Not grabbing, not shouting the answer, waiting.
- Working memory. Holding information in mind while doing something with it. Remembering the rule while playing the game.
- Cognitive flexibility. Switching between rules or perspectives when the situation changes.
Together these are often called executive function. They develop rapidly between roughly three and six, continue developing into early adulthood, and are markedly affected by tiredness, hunger, stress and novelty. A four year old who managed something on Tuesday and cannot on Wednesday is not being inconsistent; they are being four.
Vygotsky's claim, stated properly
Lev Vygotsky argued in the 1930s, in work published in English as Mind in Society in 1978, that in play a child behaves beyond their average age and above their daily behaviour. His specific observation was that pretend play is not free of rules but is saturated with them. A child playing at being a mother follows the rules of being a mother as they understand them, and does so voluntarily.
The consequence he drew is the interesting one. The pleasure of the role is what makes the rule bearable, so a child can sustain restraint inside a game that they could not sustain outside it. The often quoted example is that a child asked to stand still will manage a short time, while the same child playing a sentry will stand still for far longer.
The rule the child adopts inside a role is doing the work that an instruction from outside cannot do.
This remains the standard theoretical account of why pretend play and self-control are connected. It is a theory rather than a finding, and it should be described as such.
Why a role makes restraint cheaper
Three features of role play seem to matter.
The rule is owned. A rule adopted as part of a chosen identity is not experienced as a constraint imposed by an adult, which removes the resistance that instruction generates.
The rule is external to the self. Acting as a character puts a small distance between the child and the impulse. This is the same principle behind the self-distancing techniques that appear in the child self-control literature, where children asked to consider what a competent character would do persist longer than children asked what they themselves should do.
The rule is socially enforced. In group pretend play, other children police the fiction vigorously. Breaking the rules of the game has an immediate social cost, which is a far more effective enforcement mechanism than adult reminding.
What the evidence supports, and where it stops
Three claims should be separated.
The first, that early self-regulation is associated with later outcomes including academic attainment and wellbeing, is well supported by longitudinal work across several countries. It is correlational, and shared family and socioeconomic factors explain part of it.
The second, that pretend play involves self-regulation, is supported by observation and is fairly uncontroversial. Watching children maintain a complex fiction makes the demand visible.
The third, that pretend play interventions improve self-regulation durably, is where things get difficult. Some structured curricula reported large gains in early trials. Attempts at replication have produced smaller and less consistent results, and several well conducted evaluations found little effect. This is a familiar pattern in educational research and it is a reason for caution rather than a reason for dismissal.
| Claim | Status | Main limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Early self-regulation predicts later outcomes | Well supported | Correlational; shared background factors |
| Pretend play exercises self-regulation | Observationally clear | Hard to quantify outside the moment |
| Play programmes durably improve self-regulation | Contested | Replication has been inconsistent |
An editorial summary of the state of the literature, current at the date of review below.
What follows for adults
The practical implications are smaller than the theory suggests, and that is worth saying rather than hiding.
Where a child is struggling to hold themselves together, offering a role is often more effective than offering an instruction, and costs nothing to try. Long uninterrupted stretches allow the complex rule-bound fiction that does the work, while short slots produce only the simplest pretend. Group play does more than solo play, because other children enforce the rules. And an adult who joins as a character can sustain a game, while an adult who joins as a manager usually ends it.
What does not follow is that a family should buy a self-regulation programme. The evidence for commercial versions is not there, and the ordinary conditions, time, other children and materials without a script, are free.
Realistic expectations by age
Very short delays, heavy reliance on adult support, rules held for seconds rather than minutes. Failure is the norm and not a signal.
Rules held inside a game far longer than outside it. Sharp fluctuation with tiredness, hunger and novelty.
Rule-governed games with explicit rules become viable. Losing is still hard, and losing well is a separate skill that develops later.
Ranges are approximate and executive function varies enormously within any age band.
This article is about typical development and does not assess or diagnose anything. Persistent, pervasive difficulty with impulse control that is present across settings and interfering with daily life is a different question, and it belongs with a GP or the child's setting rather than with an article. NICE guideline NG87 sets out how such concerns are assessed in the UK.
Common questions
What is self-regulation in a child?
The ability to hold a goal in mind and act on it rather than on the strongest immediate impulse. It is usually described as three components: inhibitory control, working memory and cognitive flexibility, which together are called executive function.
Why does my child follow rules in a game but not from me?
Because a rule adopted as part of a chosen role is owned rather than imposed, and because other children in the game enforce it immediately. Vygotsky's account of this from the 1930s remains the standard explanation, and it is a theory rather than a measured finding.
Do self-regulation programmes work?
The evidence is mixed. Some structured early years curricula reported large gains in early trials, and attempts at replication have produced smaller and less consistent results. Treat any strong claim about a purchasable programme with caution and ask which independent evaluation supports it.
At what age should a child be able to wait?
Waiting develops gradually and fluctuates enormously with tiredness, hunger and novelty. A four year old who waits successfully one day and not the next is not being inconsistent. Expecting sustained self-control from a child under about five, outside a game they have chosen, is expecting something the developing system does not yet reliably supply.
Does losing at games teach self-control?
Rule-governed games with a winner become viable around five and are genuinely demanding, because losing requires managing disappointment while staying in the activity. Losing well is a separate and later skill, and adults who let a child win remove the thing being practised.
Is fidgeting a self-regulation problem?
Usually not. Movement is how many children maintain attention rather than how they lose it, and requiring stillness can make attention harder rather than easier. Persistent difficulty across settings that interferes with daily life is a different picture and belongs with a GP.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
- Department for Education, Early years foundation stage statutory framework
- Education Endowment Foundation, Early Years Toolkit
- British Psychological Society
- NICE NG87, Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: diagnosis and management
Institution level sources, cited for their public and verifiable character rather than as endorsement of this publication. External links carry nofollow.
Written and reviewed by the editorial team of Kids Play Magazine. Published 25 August 2026. Last reviewed 25 August 2026.
Read next
- Creative play and imagination
Symbolic thought, narrative and the creativity claim.
- Play-based learning explained
Free play, guided play and instruction, and what each is for.
- How adults support play without taking it over
Joining as a character rather than as a manager.
One piece of evidence, explained properly, every fortnight
What a piece of research on children and play actually found, what it did not find, and whether it should change anything. No product recommendations, because this publication does not make any.
One sponsored line per issue, marked as sponsored, at a published rate. Nothing else is sold. See newsletter and sponsorship for the rate and for the list of things it cannot buy.